What are the controversies surrounding the CBP One app for migrants seeking asylum in the US and what are the arguments made by both sides of the debate?

## CBP One App for Migrants: A Source of Controversy on Both Sides of the Immigration Debate

The CBP One app, a government mobile application for migrants seeking asylum at the southern border, has sparked heated debates on both sides of the immigration discourse. Launched by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), the app allows migrants to schedule appointments at points of entry into the United States.

Arguments in Favor of the App

CBP argues that the CBP One app has “increased CBP’s capacity to process migrants more efficiently and orderly while cutting out unscrupulous smugglers who endanger and profit from vulnerable migrants.” The app streamlines the process for asylum seekers, reducing wait times and ensuring a more organized flow of individuals into the country.

Arguments Against the App

However, Amnesty International has raised concerns about the mandatory use of the app for asylum seekers. In a report released this week, the human rights organization claims that the app “creates layers of complexity and obstacles to an already challenging process.” By requiring prior appointments and limiting the manner in which migrants can seek protection, it violates international human rights and refugee law.

Political Divide Over the App

The controversy surrounding the CBP One app has also taken a political turn. Republican senators have introduced a bill to block migrants from using the app as identification at Transportation Security Administration (TSA) checkpoints. The bill claims that it encourages illegal border crossings.

  • The House Committee on Homeland Security has criticized the app’s “shocking abuse,” alleging that a high proportion of inadmissible aliens scheduled appointments through the app were admitted into the country.
  • Chairman Mark Green, R-Tenn., has accused Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas of using the app as a “smokescreen for the mass release of individuals into this country who would otherwise have zero claim to be admitted.”

Government’s Rebuttal

The government maintains that the app allows border agents to focus on other security issues and discourages illegal crossings. Acting executive assistant commissioner of CBP’s office of field operations, Diane Sabatino, has stated that “migrants showing up at our ports of entry without any advance information quickly overwhelm our teams.”


The CBP One app for migrants seeking asylum has become a contentious issue, highlighting the complex and multifaceted nature of immigration in the United States. While some argue that the app streamlines the asylum process and enhances border security, others contend that it creates barriers and violates human rights. As the debate continues, it remains to be seen how the app will ultimately impact the immigration system and the lives of those seeking protection within the country.

Related Post

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *